![]() |
![]() |
3389 | ![]() |
||||
![]() | |||||||
| Readability | |||||||
The order in which operators are processed in this expression is not sufficiently clear and so additional parentheses are recommended. In the absence of parentheses, the sequence is determined by rules of precedence and associativity. In this expression, the ordering of two operations needs to be clarified; one is a % operator and the other is a +, -, * or / operator or another %. Add parentheses to make it clear which operator is evaluated first. For example:
/*PRQA S 584,2017,3103,3198,3199,3203,3401,3408,3447 ++*/
extern int a;
extern int b;
extern int c;
extern void foo(void)
{
int r;
r = a + b % c; /* Message 3389 + 3390 */
r = a + (b % c); /* OK */
r = a % b % c; /* Message 3389 + 3390 */
r = (a % b) % c; /* OK */
r = a % b * c; /* Message 3389 + 3390 */
r = (a % b) * c; /* OK */
r = a * b % c; /* Message 3389 + 3390 */
r = (a * b) % c; /* OK */
}
MISRA C:2012 Rules applicable to message 3389:
| Rule-12.1 (Advisory) | The precedence of operators within expressions should be made explicit |
See also:
![]() | ||
| QA·C Source Code Analyser 8.1
MISRA C:2012 Compliance Module 1.0 © 2012 Programming Research. www.programmingresearch.com | Personality Groups | Glossary | Message Index | MISRA C:2012 Rule Index | Contents |