![]() |
![]() |
2980 | ![]() |
||||
![]() | |||||||
| Redundancy | |||||||
The value passed in this function parameter is always modified before being used and so the parameter is effectively redundant. Is this really intended ? For example:
/*PRQA S 2017,2986,3195,3203,3227,3408 ++*/
int foo(int n, int x) /* 2980 */
{
n = x + 1;
return n;
}
MISRA-C:2004 Rules applicable to message 2980:
| Rule 21.1 (Required) | Minimisation of run-time failures shall be ensured by the use of at least one of (a) static analysis tools/techniques; (b) dynamic analysis tools/techniques; (c) explicit coding of checks to handle run-time faults |
![]() | ||
| QA·C Source Code Analyser 8.1
MISRA-C:2004 Compliance Module 3.2 © 2012 Programming Research. www.programmingresearch.com | Personality Groups | Glossary | Message Index | MISRA-C:2004 Rule Index | Contents |